Peer reviewing

Rules of the review of scientific articles

Articles coming to the editor of the scientific collection and the corresponding category does not violate its Publication Ethics, are reviewed with a view to peer review. All reviewers are acknowledged experts on the subject of peer-reviewed materials and have the publication of peer-reviewed articles on the subject.
Reviewers are notified that they sent the manuscript is the intellectual property of the authors and are reportedly not subject to disclosure.
Timing review in each case determined by the editorial staff with the creation of conditions for the most rapid publication of articles.
When receiving a negative review editors sends a copy to the author reviews the proposal to modify the article in accordance with the reviewers' comments or arguments to refute them, or send the author a reasoned refusal.
Articles, modified or revised by the author, re-routed for review.

Rules for publication of scientific articles in the scientific paper collection

The decision whether the publication is received after review by the editorial board for the formation of the next releases. The solution of the Editorial Board reported to the author by e-mail.
Not allowed to be published:
a) articles which revealed violations of the rules of ethics of publication of the magazine (see. section "Publication Ethics");
b) articles that do not meet the requirements of the magazine, and the authors disclaim their technical improvements;
c) article, the authors of which do not comply with the constructive comments of the reviewer or arguments do not refute them.